Trust and transparency
Editorial and AI standards
You should be able to see where a claim came from, what is our interpretation, and what remains uncertain.
Last reviewed August 2, 2026 · Editorial owner: Jesse Krim
What we publish
Mentor News explains a dated, verifiable development and, when evidence supports it, connects that development to a mentor’s documented public history. Mentor Briefings are human-reviewed Get Mentors editorials. Neither format turns a headline into a timeless principle or claims to know a person’s private motive.
Source and identity checks
We check that a story is about the right person, not someone with the same name or a passing mention. We also check the date, original source, attribution, and any corrections. If the evidence is unclear, we hold the story.
Facts, analysis, and uncertainty
Article facts remain attributed to their original reporting. Get Mentors analysis is labeled and grounded in documented public material. We say what is known, what is interpretation, what remains unknown, and what measurable development could confirm or weaken the comparison.
AI assistance
We use software and AI to find and organize sources, check names, identify duplicate stories, and help prepare content. AI-assisted illustrations are labeled. A person reviews Mentor Briefings before publication. Our standard is the same with or without AI: do not invent quotes, explanations, endorsements, or private motives.
Authorship and review
Jesse Krim, founder of Get Mentors, writes and edits Mentor Briefings and owns the editorial standards. Automated Mentor News identifies its source and separates reporting from Get Mentors analysis on every explainer.
Updates and corrections
We preserve publication dates, canonical sources, and material updates. When a factual error is confirmed, we correct the page and record the material change. A source correction or retraction can cause an item to be updated, de-indexed, or removed from public display.